Interesting development with my Alliant Energy dispute. The TOU peak window on the bill doesn''t match the current tariff definition. The demand ratchet is being applied at 85% instead of the tariff''s 70%.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Finally resolved Pacific Gas & Electric dispute — $3,800/month settlement
Nice find. I''ve started using interval data analysis software to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Nice find. I''ve started using a Python script I wrote to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Great catch, Terry M. I''ve seen Wisconsin Energy do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the demand measured at 15-min intervals against the original service application.