Had a breakthrough on a Idaho Power case this week. The meter nameplate shows 400:5 but the billing system has 300:5. Client''s been paying $7,200 too much every month since 2019.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Pacific Gas & Electric Schedule GL-1 misapplication — $31,500/month impact
Good work Angela R. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check ratchet clauses on every audit.
Had the exact same problem with Salt River Project last year. Took about 18 months to resolve but got full refund.
Great catch, Angela R. I''ve seen Pacific Gas & Electric do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.