Got a new gym client in Phoenix and found something concerning. Client''s been paying $3,100 too much every month since 2021. The demand ratchet is being applied at 80% instead of the tariff''s 75%.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Success story: $5,800 recovered from Xcel Energy
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the ratchet at 80% of peak against the original service application.
Good thread. I want to emphasize what Andy R said about TOU allocation. This comes up frequently and the correct approach is to always verify against the published tariff, never assume the bill is right.