Interesting development with my PPL Electric dispute. The utility''s position is that estimated reads are within tolerance, but the tariff language doesn''t support that. The utility''s position is that estimated reads are within tolerance, but the tariff language doesn''t support that.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Just discovered voltage discount missing at Oncor client in Montgomery
Be careful with Ameren Missouri''s refund process — they sometimes try to limit the lookback period to 3 years.
Nice find. I''ve started using interval data analysis software to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
This is exactly why I always pull 24+ months of history. The pattern wouldn''t show in a shorter window.
Great catch, Walt O. I''ve seen Salt River Project do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.