Had a breakthrough on a PSE&G case this week. The utility''s position is that the meter was configured correctly, but the tariff language doesn''t support that. The TOU peak window on the bill doesn''t match the current tariff definition.
Puget Sound Energy Schedule TS misapplication — $42,000/month impact
Good work Mike W. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check tariff interpretation on every audit.
This is exactly why I always pull 12+ months of history. The pattern wouldn''t show in a shorter window.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the power factor minimum 0.95 against the original service application.
This is exactly why I always pull 48+ months of history. The pattern wouldn''t show in a shorter window.
Welcome insights here. I''d add that Southern California Edison''s billing system has had known issues with franchise fees since their platform migration. Document everything carefully.