Follow-up on my earlier post about TOU allocation. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 200:5. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 200:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Just discovered demand ratchet miscalculation at Puget Sound Energy client in Eugene
Great catch, Randy Dawson. I''ve seen DTE Energy do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Excellent discussion everyone. Craig P, your approach on this CPS Energy case is solid. For newer members, this is a great example of why thorough tariff review is essential.