Interesting development with my Georgia Power dispute. The TOU peak window on the bill doesn''t match the current tariff definition. The Rate GV rate schedule clearly states power factor minimum 0.95, but the bill shows 100% ratchet applied.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Client in Detroit — DTE Energy rider miscalculation for 4 years straight
Great catch, Jorge M. I''ve seen NIPSCO do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the power factor minimum 0.95 against the original service application.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.
I''d recommend requesting the meter test records from Alabama Power. That''s what cracked my case open.
This is exactly why I always pull 36+ months of history. The pattern wouldn''t show in a shorter window.
Excellent discussion everyone. Jorge M, your approach on this Liberty Utilities case is solid. For newer members, this is a great example of why thorough tariff review is essential.