Had a breakthrough on a PSE&G case this week. We pulled 48 months of billing history and found the fuel adjustment error started in 2018. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 100:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
NIPSCO Rate I-5 misapplication — $21,300/month impact
Had the exact same problem with Rocky Mountain Power last year. Took about 36 months to resolve but got full refund.
Good thread. I want to emphasize what Vince S said about demand charges. This comes up frequently and the correct approach is to always verify against the published tariff, never assume the bill is right.