Had a breakthrough on a APS case this week. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 100:5. Compared the interval data against the bill and found demand values that exceed physical capacity.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Transformer losses — primary vs secondary metering
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.
Had the exact same problem with Avista last year. Took about 12 months to resolve but got full refund.
Nice find. I''ve started using a custom Excel template to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.