Peak demand coincident vs non-coincident — Georgia Power

Started by Diane — 10 years ago — 6 views
Follow-up on my earlier post about billing periods. Filed the formal complaint with the PUC last week — waiting on their response. The meter nameplate shows 400:5 but the billing system has 200:5.
Ken G, what was the client''s reaction when you showed them the $890/month overcharge?
Good work Steve B. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check ratchet clauses on every audit.
Hector R, you should also check the meter configuration while you''re at it. These errors tend to cluster.