Follow-up on my earlier post about billing periods. Filed the formal complaint with the PUC last week — waiting on their response. The meter nameplate shows 400:5 but the billing system has 200:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Peak demand coincident vs non-coincident — Georgia Power
Good work Steve B. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check ratchet clauses on every audit.