Interesting development with my Portland General Electric dispute. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 300:5. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 300:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Client in Bismarck — JEA demand reset failure for 4 years straight
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility's escalation process first — it's faster.
Solid analysis. One thing I'd add is to verify the seasonal rates apply May-October against the original service application.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility's escalation process first — it's faster.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility's escalation process first — it's faster.