Client in Bismarck — JEA demand reset failure for 4 years straight

Started by Elisa L. — 2 years ago — 11 views
Interesting development with my Portland General Electric dispute. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 300:5. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 300:5.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the seasonal rates apply May-October against the original service application.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.