Need some experienced eyes on a Entergy billing issue. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 100:5. Compared the interval data against the bill and found demand values that exceed physical capacity.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Consumers Energy Rate SC-9 misapplication — $9,400/month impact
I disagree with the approach of going straight to the PUC. Try the utility''s escalation process first — it''s faster.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the demand measured at 15-min intervals against the original service application.
Bob A, what was the client''s reaction when you showed them the $15,700 overcharge?
Good work Barry W. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check ratchet clauses on every audit.