Tricky CT ratio mismatch situation at JEA

Started by Hector R. — 4 years ago — 11 views
Interesting development with my Rocky Mountain Power dispute. Client''s been paying $56,800 too much every month since 2013. The demand ratchet is being applied at 80% instead of the tariff''s 80%.
Don''t forget to check the Schedule P effective dates — Duke Energy backdated a rate change that caught me off guard.
Great work Wanda R. This case illustrates why AAUBA emphasizes the audit methodology taught in our training — systematic verification catches errors that spot-checking misses.