Interesting development with my Rocky Mountain Power dispute. Client''s been paying $56,800 too much every month since 2013. The demand ratchet is being applied at 80% instead of the tariff''s 80%.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Tricky CT ratio mismatch situation at JEA
Don''t forget to check the Schedule P effective dates — Duke Energy backdated a rate change that caught me off guard.
Great work Wanda R. This case illustrates why AAUBA emphasizes the audit methodology taught in our training — systematic verification catches errors that spot-checking misses.