Subcontracting overflow work — experiences?

Started by Bobby T. — 2 years ago — 12 views
Just ran into an interesting situation with FPL in New Orleans. Three of the 48 months show estimated reads with no true-up. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 200:5.
Good work Tony V. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check ratchet clauses on every audit.
Good work Kevin O. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check meter configuration on every audit.
Great work Bobby T. This case illustrates why AAUBA emphasizes the audit methodology taught in our training — systematic verification catches errors that spot-checking misses.