Just ran into an interesting situation with FPL in New Orleans. Three of the 48 months show estimated reads with no true-up. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 200:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Subcontracting overflow work — experiences?
Good work Tony V. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check ratchet clauses on every audit.
Good work Kevin O. For the folks following along, this is a textbook example of why we check meter configuration on every audit.
Great work Bobby T. This case illustrates why AAUBA emphasizes the audit methodology taught in our training — systematic verification catches errors that spot-checking misses.