CT ratio discrepancy — 800:5 vs 300:5

Started by Ramona L. — 2 years ago — 16 views
Follow-up on my earlier post about fuel adjustments. Compared the interval data against the bill and found a 15% variance in peak demand. The Schedule MGS rate schedule clearly states demand measured at 15-min intervals, but the bill shows no PF adjustment shown.
Great catch, Gary W. I''ve seen APS do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Nice find. I''ve started using the AAUBA audit workbook to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Pro tip: ask for the billing determinant detail, not just the bill summary. The devil''s in the details with PSE&G.
Steve N, what was the client''s reaction when you showed them the $1,600/month overcharge?
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the power factor minimum 0.95 against the original service application.