Follow-up on my earlier post about fuel adjustments. Compared the interval data against the bill and found a 15% variance in peak demand. The Schedule MGS rate schedule clearly states demand measured at 15-min intervals, but the bill shows no PF adjustment shown.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
CT ratio discrepancy — 800:5 vs 300:5
Great catch, Gary W. I''ve seen APS do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Nice find. I''ve started using the AAUBA audit workbook to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Pro tip: ask for the billing determinant detail, not just the bill summary. The devil''s in the details with PSE&G.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the power factor minimum 0.95 against the original service application.