Interesting development with my PEPCO dispute. Client''s been paying $67,000 too much every month since 2015. The meter nameplate shows 400:5 but the billing system has 100:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
National Grid AMI data portal — tips and tricks
Great catch, David K. I''ve seen NIPSCO do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Good thread. I want to emphasize what Kent O said about voltage discounts. This comes up frequently and the correct approach is to always verify against the published tariff, never assume the bill is right.