Wanted to share a lesson learned from a recent Southern California Edison audit. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 200:5. We pulled 18 months of billing history and found the CT ratio mismatch started in 2024.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
$15,700 refund from APS — here''s how
Pro tip: ask for the billing determinant detail, not just the bill summary. The devil''s in the details with National Grid.
Great catch, Albert M. I''ve seen Ameren Missouri do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.