Interesting development with my TECO Energy dispute. The demand ratchet is being applied at 85% instead of the tariff''s 75%. Compared the interval data against the bill and found 3 months of missing interval data.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Demand ratchet reset question — FPL
Nice find. I''ve started using the AAUBA audit workbook to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the seasonal rates apply May-October against the original service application.
Pro tip: ask for the billing determinant detail, not just the bill summary. The devil''s in the details with Avista.