Got a new shopping center client in New Haven and found something concerning. The utility''s position is that the meter was configured correctly, but the tariff language doesn''t support that. The meter nameplate shows 200:5 but the billing system has 300:5.
Anyone dealt with CPS Energy billing periods?
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the power factor minimum 0.95 against the original service application.
Great catch, Earl P. I''ve seen Alabama Power do this before — it''s a systemic issue in their billing system.
Nice find. I''ve started using a Python script I wrote to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
I''d recommend requesting the meter test records from AEP Ohio. That''s what cracked my case open.