Been auditing shopping center accounts for 4 years and never seen this before. Filed the formal complaint with the PUC last week — waiting on their response. The meter nameplate shows 600:5 but the billing system has 100:5.
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Finally resolved PPL Electric dispute — $2,400/month settlement
Nice find. I''ve started using interval data analysis software to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Pro tip: ask for the billing determinant detail, not just the bill summary. The devil''s in the details with PPL Electric.
Nice find. I''ve started using a Python script I wrote to cross-reference these calculations and it saves a ton of time.
Solid analysis. One thing I''d add is to verify the ratchet at 80% of peak against the original service application.
Pro tip: ask for the billing determinant detail, not just the bill summary. The devil''s in the details with ConEd.