I've been doing this about 18 months and I'm still not sure if my contingency fee is in the right range. I've been charging 40% of recovered overcharges plus 40% of ongoing savings for 12 months. Had a couple prospects balk at that. What are you all charging?
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
What percentage do you charge?
Forty percent is on the higher end but not unreasonable, especially for smaller accounts. I charge 50% on accounts under $5,000/month in utility spend and 30-35% on larger accounts. The bigger the account, the more competitive you need to be. I audited a manufacturing plant in Akron for Ohio Edison — $38,000/month spend — and charged 25% because the errors were obvious and the recovery was going to be huge. Ended up finding $14,200/month in rate classification errors and the client was thrilled even at my fee.
The key thing to remember is that you are providing a zero-risk service. The client pays nothing unless you find savings. Frame it that way every single time. When a prospect balks at 40%, I ask them: would you rather keep 100% of zero, or 60% of something you didn't even know you were losing? That reframe works almost every time. As for specific percentages, 30-50% is the industry range. I recommend starting at 50% for your first few clients while you build your track record, then you can adjust based on account size and complexity.
I also vary my percentage based on whether it's a refund or ongoing savings. For refunds going back 2-3 years, I charge 50% because that's found money the client had written off. For ongoing monthly savings, I charge 33% for the first 24 months. This way the client sees immediate relief in their monthly bill while I still get compensated fairly. Closed a deal with a grocery chain in Charlotte — 14 locations on Duke Energy — using this split structure and they loved it.
The split structure is a great idea. I'm going to try that on my next prospect. And Randy, you're right about the reframe — I've been presenting it wrong, leading with the percentage instead of leading with the zero risk angle. Appreciate the help.