Quick question for anyone familiar with NV Energy here in Nevada. They've added a "Transmission Infrastructure Investment Rider" to my client's bill - $0.00847 per kWh. Bill impact is about $2,100 monthly for this casino account. The rider references PUCN Docket 14-07046 but when I looked it up, that docket was for distribution upgrades, not transmission. Am I missing something or is NV Energy applying the wrong rider?
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
NV Energy infrastructure rider - is this legit?
Kim, I don't know Nevada specifically but that sounds like they might be double-dipping or misapplying riders. We had a similar issue with Entergy where they were charging a transmission rider for distribution work. The docket number discrepancy is a red flag. I'd call them out on it and demand they show exactly which PUC order authorizes that specific rider amount.
Kim, I deal with PG&E here in California and we see similar transmission/distribution rider confusion. The key is getting the exact tariff sheet that shows the rider calculation and comparing it to the approved PUC order. If the docket was for distribution but they're calling it transmission, that's definitely worth challenging. Nevada PUC staff are usually helpful if you call them directly.