Janet W. in Spokane here. I've got a weird situation with a multi-tenant office building where Avista Energy has the main meter correct but the sub-meters for individual tenants seem to have wrong multipliers. The total of all sub-meters is reading 40% higher than the main utility meter. Has anyone dealt with sub-metering multiplier errors before?
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Sub-metering Multiplier Issues in Multi-Tenant Building
Theresa K. from Bozeman - Janet, are these utility-owned sub-meters or customer-owned? NorthWestern Energy uses different CT ratios for sub-meters sometimes and the programming can get mixed up. I had a case where they used 200:1 CTs but programmed 100:1 multipliers on half the sub-meters.
Theresa - these are Avista-owned sub-meters, all installed at the same time last year. Each tenant is getting billed separately but when I add up all their usage it's way more than the main meter shows. Something is definitely wrong with the calculations.
Gail P. in Missoula here - I've seen this with NorthWestern where they copy the main meter's CT ratio to all sub-meters even though the sub-meters have different CTs. Could be they programmed all your sub-meters with the same multiplier when they should be different ratios.
Randy Dawson here. Janet, sub-metering multiplier errors are becoming more common as utilities install more AMI systems in multi-tenant buildings. The problem is often that technicians copy settings from one meter to another without verifying the actual CT ratios. You need to physically verify each sub-meter's CT ratios and compare to the billing multipliers. Also check if estimated readings on any sub-meters are masking the problem - if one sub-meter has been estimated for months, the error might be worse than it appears. Request actual readings for all meters for the same billing periods.
Vince S. from Hartford - Randy's right about estimated reads masking problems. Eversource had our sub-meters estimated for 6 months while the main meter was actual reads. When they finally got actual readings from all meters, we discovered massive overbilling on Schedule GS-1 accounts.
Good point about estimated reads Vince. I'm going to request 12 months of actual vs estimated reading flags for all meters. This building has 8 sub-meters and if some were estimated while others weren't, that could explain the discrepancy. Will report back what I find.
Tamara E. from Chattanooga here. Janet, also verify that all your sub-meters are on the same rate schedule. EPB had some of our sub-meters on Schedule GSA and others on Schedule GSB with different demand calculations. Made the billing totals look wrong even though multipliers were correct.
Kevin N. in Mobile - following this thread. Alabama Power is installing sub-meters in our building next month and I want to avoid these issues. Janet, did you ever get resolution on your multiplier problems?
Kevin - finally got it resolved! Turned out 5 of the 8 sub-meters had CTs programmed wrong. Avista admitted the installation crew used copy-paste settings instead of verifying each CT ratio. Getting refunds totaling $28,000 across all affected tenants. The key was Randy's advice to verify every CT nameplate physically.