Avista client contract requires binding arbitration for disputes. My lawyer says this limits my options if they don't pay. What do you include for dispute resolution?
Dispute resolution - arbitration vs litigation
San Diego Gas & Electric clients prefer arbitration. It's faster and cheaper than court, but you give up right to jury trial. I'm comfortable with it.
Indiana Michigan Power dispute went to small claims court. Simple contract breach, got judgment in 6 weeks. Arbitration might have taken longer.
Louisville Gas & Electric client tried to force arbitration after refusing to pay $28K fee. My contract specified Kentucky state court jurisdiction. Won in 4 months.
Duke Energy Carolinas prefers mediation first, then arbitration. Non-binding mediation resolves most payment disputes without formal proceedings.
NorthWestern Energy clients in North Dakota accept court jurisdiction. Rural state, judges understand business disputes. Arbitration could mean travel to distant cities.
TVA-served clients want arbitration through American Arbitration Association. More expensive but arbitrators understand complex commercial relationships.
Consider your local court system, typical dispute amounts, and client preferences. Arbitration works well for larger disputes with sophisticated clients, while local courts may be better for smaller payment issues with less complex contracts.