Charles from Fargo. New client runs a co-working space with about 80 desks, several private offices, a shared kitchen, and a podcast recording studio. The utility has them on a general office rate. The HVAC and lighting load is standard office but the podcast studio has specialized power conditioning equipment and the shared kitchen has commercial-grade appliances. Is a co-working space a single rate class or is there a mixed-use argument?
Member Community
Enter your email to read this discussion
You're reading the AAUBA Member Forum — where Certified Utility Bill Auditors share case studies, tariff strategies, and industry insights.
Free to read. Enter your email to continue.
No spam. We'll send you one welcome email about CUBA certification. Unsubscribe any time.
Rate class for co-working space — not quite office, not quite commercial
Steve from Raleigh. Co-working spaces are genuinely ambiguous from a rate class perspective. Most utilities have not created a specific schedule for them and default to office or light commercial. The question is whether the non-office elements are material enough to argue for a different classification.
The kitchen and studio together represent about 20 percent of the square footage and I estimate maybe 35 percent of the load because of the specialized equipment.
Steve again. At 35 percent of load the non-office use is material. I would look at whether a general commercial rate — as opposed to a specific office rate — has lower demand charges for the mixed load profile. Sometimes the less-specific classification is actually more favorable.
Ted from Spokane. Also ask the client if they have any plans to add a cafe or food service. That would push the classification further toward commercial and might open up a food service rate eligibility that would not apply today.
Ted they have been talking about adding a small coffee bar. If that goes forward the rate class question gets more interesting.
Steve one more time. For now I would document the current mixed use and present the office rate as a potential error with the caveat that the analysis may change if operations expand. Sets up a follow-on engagement naturally.